El vie, 05-03-2010 a las 22:06 +0100, Ben de Groot escribió: > > > If no, I can split off utils from poppler - with CMake it's effortless. > > We just rejoined the split poppler into one package again. So if you > are going to split it up again, you will have some explaining to do to > our users. I would like to prevent splitting, and see if we can fix maybe > the cups ebuild instead. Or maybe the gtk+ maintainers want to split > up their package... I understand they like that sort of thing. > > Cheers,
I think that it will be easy to explain users that we *need* to split poppler and poppler-utils to prevent circular dependencies. About splitting others... well, sometime ago I saw that cups is being split in Arch (having cups and libcups) when trying to investigate how to deal with avahi -> gtk+ -> cups -> avahi circular dep problems (bug 222601), but I don't know if it could help with this case and how much work would it require :-/ Best regards
signature.asc
Description: Esta parte del mensaje está firmada digitalmente
