-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Hasan Khalil wrote: | We do not yet have policy for packages that are provided by Apple and | that have a different API than that of the gnu version. I'm opening up | the floor here for discussion on this.
Virtuals would seem to be the method to use which fits most seamlessly into portage. On the other hand, if the API to BSD package is significantly different from the GNU package I would suggest duplicating the functionality of the (g)sed ebuild.
How many packages are we going to have to apply these changes to? Should we use a gwrapper.eclass to make something like this easier to maintain?
- -Nick Dimiduk -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFCAMERMRGACoLVQ1kRAjDbAKCSzCVojq9hV9ODKD2cApXUyxtGxQCZAYos 1eRyRovLpIcKxAx1dzxJv8A= =hbGO -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-- gentoo-osx@gentoo.org mailing list
