On Tue, 2003-06-03 at 10:19, Michael Rasile wrote:
> On Mon Jun 02, 2003 at 09:38:18PM +0000 or thereabouts, --[ UxBoD ]-- wrote:
> > Why didn't you use the one in portage? what changes did you make in your
> > XF86Config file?
> > -- 
> > 
> > --[ UxBoD ]-- 
> > GPGKID [402E340E] [182C F930 C7E4 CA70 A202  9A82 82AC B1EA 402E 340E]
> > gpg --keyserver wwwkeys.pgp.net --recv-keys 402E340E
> > 
> > 
> I chose to use the driver from the nvidia site because it is the latest driver and 
> it does install quite easily. There is one file and the install, IMO, is much easier 
> than the portage and it is not the latest version of the driver. I'll send along my 
> XF86Config file for you.
> 
I can't get either the Nvidia sourced or portage sourced Nvidia drivers
to work. I get these errors from the portage driver:

#modprobe nvidia
/lib/modules/2.4.20-gentoo-r5/video/nvidia.o: unresolved symbol
_mmx_memcpy
/lib/modules/2.4.20-gentoo-r5/video/nvidia.o:
Hint: You are trying to load a module without a GPL compatible license
      and it has unresolved symbols.  Contact the module supplier for
      assistance, only they can help you.

/lib/modules/2.4.20-gentoo-r5/video/nvidia.o: insmod
/lib/modules/2.4.20-gentoo-r5/video/nvidia.o failed
/lib/modules/2.4.20-gentoo-r5/video/nvidia.o: insmod nvidia failed

And the Nvidia sourced driver just won't compile and complains about the
kernel source :/


--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list

Reply via email to