----- Original Message ---- > From: Neil Bothwick <n...@digimed.co.uk> > On Mon, 25 Oct 2010 00:29:30 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote: > > > Although, perhaps I'm missing something but doesn't alpha > > > come *before* release candidate? :) > > Yes, but: > > > > 2.2.0_alpha1 comes *after* 2.2_rc99 > > It should also come after 2.2, but I appear to have missed that release.
Why? 2.2 == 2.2.0 So 2.2.0_alpha1 would make a logical progression. Ben
