On Mon, 2011-01-17 at 10:07 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote: > Apparently, though unproven, at 03:39 on Monday 17 January 2011, William > Kenworthy did opine thusly: > > > On Sun, 2011-01-16 at 17:26 -0800, Mark Knecht wrote: > > > On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 5:13 PM, William Kenworthy <bi...@iinet.net.au> > wrote: > > > > On Sun, 2011-01-16 at 14:41 -0800, Grant wrote: > > ... > > > > > I think that's well worded. He has insufficient memory when emerging. > > > > > > If he's really running short of DRAM Then he might also do well to > > > boot to a console and do his emerges there. No memory given over to > > > other things like KDE or browsers, etc. > > > > > > I am a bit surprised though that a -j1 type emerge would be running > > > out of memory on a 3GB machine. I just finished emerge updates on a > > > desktop with 4GB and only used 2.5GB which includes KDE, FIrefox and a > > > > > number of other things: > > I have a diskless 3GB ram atom system (mythtv frontend) and I have to > > arrange swap over nbd for gcc and glibc emerges - others just get very > > slow when getting to limits, or get flaky unless -j1 is used. Havent > > tried OO on it yet :) > > I'M flabbergasted. 3G is really a gigantic amount of memory and yet the > machine still runs out of the stuff? > > Something is seriously wrong somewhere when code does this. I know memory is > cheap and all, but still ... that's just excessive
Your behind the times Alan - 3G was a huge amount 10 years ago ... Ahh, progress ... BillK
