On Thursday 28 Jul 2011 16:45:54 Paul Hartman wrote: > On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 10:31 AM, Mick <michaelkintz...@gmail.com> wrote: > > All sounds good, except that libreoffice requires acres of space to > > emerge and on at least two machines I'll have to move to binary. > > Is it much worse than OpenOffice? Build times are nearly identical on > my system but I haven't paid attention to temp space needed during the > emerge process.
By about +3G may be more! -- Regards, Mick
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
