On 2011-07-28 12:00 PM, Mick <michaelkintz...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thursday 28 Jul 2011 16:45:54 Paul Hartman wrote: >> On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 10:31 AM, Mick <michaelkintz...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> All sounds good, except that libreoffice requires acres of space to >>> emerge and on at least two machines I'll have to move to binary.
>> Is it much worse than OpenOffice? Build times are nearly identical on >> my system but I haven't paid attention to temp space needed during the >> emerge process. > By about +3G may be more! I think this is not so with the new 3.4.x versions...
