Am 06.09.2011 19:52, schrieb Pandu Poluan: > On 2011-09-07, Pandu Poluan <pa...@poluan.info> wrote: >> So, can anyone recommend me a filesystem that fulfills my following needs: >> >> Scenario: vFirewall (virtual Firewall) that is going to be deployed at >> my IaaS Cloud Provider. >> >> Disk I/O Characteristic: Occasional writes during 'normal' usage, >> once-a-week eix-sync + emerge -avuD >> >> Priority: Stable (i.e., less chance of corruption), least CPU usage. >> >> My Google-Fu seems to indicate either XFS or JFS; what do you think? >> >> Rgds, >> > Sorry, forgot one thing: For the time being, I'm sticking with > 2.6.39-hardened. Saw too many incompatibility bug with 3.0 (due to > packages hard-wired to expect the kernel version to begin with "2.6"). > > Rgds, > >
JFS is a pretty good and care-free choice for this. Low resource usage. Good performance, especially with large files. Although I must admit, I wouldn't use it anymore since Ext4 is usually good enough for just about every use-case and tested by more people in new kernel versions (therefore presumably more stable). Regards, Florian Philipp
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
