Peter Humphrey <pe...@humphrey.ukfsn.org> wrote:
> On Monday 19 September 2011 16:49:55 David W Noon wrote:
>
> > I hope this has explained why we should take messages about running
> > "revdep-rebuild --library libXXX" seriously.
>
> Well, you have me convinced. I had assumed that a bland revdep-rebuild would
> catch everything including the library specified. Wrong, I see.
Would preserved-rebuild catch everything that the revdep-rebuild fails
to catch?
--
Your life is like a penny. You're going to lose it. The question is:
How do
you spend it?
John Covici
cov...@ccs.covici.com
