On Nov 26, 2011 5:05 AM, "Neil Bothwick" <n...@digimed.co.uk> wrote: > > On Fri, 25 Nov 2011 23:12:42 +0700, Pandu Poluan wrote: > > > > I don't use LVM but I suspect that on this list that would be the #1 > > > recommendation to take care of the numbers question. > > > Everytime I read some guide on LVM, my eyes becomes blurry, the room > > starts spinning, and I can hear wolves howling ... :D > > > > Seriously, LVM looks mighty nice, but it also looks (and is!) mighty > > complex. > > It may look it, but you only have to learn the concepts once. That many > physical partitions will be extra work forever, imagine what happens when > one of the middle ones is no longer big enough. > > Seriously, spend half an hour reading up on LVM and you'll never regret > it. >
Oh, I certainly will. But not now. I need to get this box up, staged, and productioned ASAP. Afterwards, I'll commit myself to understanding LVM. Rgds,
