is there a gal here? Érico V. Porto
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 11:00 AM, Tanstaafl <tansta...@libertytrek.org>wrote: > On 2012-01-17 7:50 AM, Neil Bothwick <n...@digimed.co.uk> wrote: > >> On Tue, 17 Jan 2012 07:37:38 -0500, Tanstaafl wrote: >> >> I'll stick with KeePassX, the password database is >>>> stored and encrypted locally. Even if I put it on DropBox, hacking >>>> that will only give the encrypted database. >>>> >>> > And I'll stick with passwordmaker, which doesn't store the passwords at >>> all, anywhere...only the account settings used to generate them, which >>> are useless without the Master Password... >>> >> > It comes to the same thing really. whether you store the passwords >> themselves or the methods and data used to generate them, both systems >> are as strong as the master password and useless if that is compromised. >> So stick with whatever suits your way of working. Choice is good :) >> > > This is actually not correct... > > Since PWM doesn't store the passwords, there is nothing to 'crack'... > there would never be any way for an attacker who got ahold of your RDF file > to run an attack program against it - how would the attack program ever be > able to determine 'success'? > >
