On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 12:17 PM, Alex Schuster <wo...@wonkology.org> wrote: >> How would you do that? I'm currently using ~amd64 and can't yet use >> sets for some reason. > > Then you probably need portage 2.2 for this. Which will never ever become > stable it seems, but I'm using it just fine for three years now.
Yes, 2.2 is needed. And same here. Using it forever and no issues > > Is emerge @preserved-rebuild (with FEATURES=preserve-libs) also a 2.2 > feature? I like this most, I no longer need to use revdep-rebuild. I > always considered having to use it a bug, fixing broken things after > breaking them, instead of preventing breakage. Indeed, also a 2.2 thing and the biggest reason I use it honestly -- Douglas J Hunley (doug.hun...@gmail.com) Twitter: @hunleyd Web: douglasjhunley.com G+: http://goo.gl/sajR3
