On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 1:29 PM, Dale <rdalek1...@gmail.com> wrote: > Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: >> Am Montag, 17. September 2012, 12:57:49 schrieb Dale: >>> Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: >>>> Am Sonntag, 16. September 2012, 20:39:36 schrieb Dale: >>>>> The important part is about 'if you are unsure about this, say N here'. >>>>> Well, I don't think I need USB remote wakeup or anything so I don't >>>>> think I need this but at the same time, udisk is giving me notice that >>>>> it should be there. >>>> you you never thought about turning on your system via keyboard instead of >>>> crawling under the table? >>> Actually, no. I have one of those large HAF 932 cases that is about the >>> same height as my keyboard. It's just about as easy to hit one as it is >>> to hit the other. Add in that I rarely reboot either. I don't really >>> see the need to use my keyboard as a power switch, not for me anyway. I >>> have one that is on top of the case, which is where it should be in my >>> opinion. >> so you let your box run full power all the time? >> >> Doesn't that sound.... stupid? >> > > > No. To me, turning a puter on/off whenever you walk away is sort of > stupid. Me, I never know when I will be needing my puter and I don't > want to wait for it to boot up and get me logged in every time I want to > use it. The power it pulls is about the same as me leaving a light bulb > on. So, in my opinion and for my usage, leaving it on is not stupid. > Doing the opposite could be closer to stupid. Same for my TV. The only > time I turn my TV off is when I am leaving the house for a good long > while. Before you say that I am wearing out my TV, my last TV was well > over 20 years old and the only repairs to it was replacing the speakers > that dried out. It was still working when I ran up on this half price > sale for my current TV. I gave the old TV to a friend and as far as I > know, it still works. > > I'm not saying that *MY* usage should be the same as someone else's. At > the same time, mine should not be the same as yours or others. Just as > a example. I'm downloading TV shows from various websites. When I get > ready to go to bed, I line up several videos for download. It may > download for hours while I sleep. Heck, I sometimes wake up before it > gets through and I add more to the list. I can't do that if I shutdown > my computer each time I walk away. > > Stupid, not even close.
Maybe not stupid under some definitions, but a waste of power for sure. When I leave my house, I hibernate my computer; that way I can even unplug the regulator where everything is connected, so not even standby energy is wasted. When I'm in my house but not on the computer, I suspend it. When I turn it on from being hibernated, it takes about 10 seconds to get to my full desktop. When I wake it up from suspension, it takes less than 2 seconds. When it is suspended, it wastes 5 watts (instead of 4 when it's turned off, but connected to the power grid), according to: http://jeff.ecchi.ca/blog/2012/08/05/staring-into-the-axis-abyss-the-railgun-map/ Of course it would be more comfortable to just leave it on all the time. It would also be more comfortable to not separate organic and inorganic waste. Oh, and by the way, what kind of light bulbs do you use that waste as much power as your PC? Mine uses 15 watts; it's one of the new CFLs: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compact_fluorescent_lamp It is more expensive, and it's a pain to dispose it; but it gives the same light that a 75 watts normal light bulb, and it pays itself on electric bills only. Also, it will last longer. When I moved in with my GF, her electric bill shoot up to the roof (I brought my 46" LCD TV, PlayStation 3, and in total 5 computers and other electronics). After a couple of months of shock of seeing the electric bills, we started to do this kind of stuff (suspending/hibernating our machines, using CFL instead of normal light bulbs, etc.), and we cut the spending almost in four. It is a *little* inconvenience (waiting a few seconds for the TV, the PS3 or the PC to wake up), but huge money savings. THAT is certainly not stupid. Regards. -- Canek Peláez Valdés Posgrado en Ciencia e Ingeniería de la Computación Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México
