On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 8:09 AM, Kevin Chadwick <ma1l1i...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote: > On Fri, 21 Dec 2012 05:46:33 +0800 > Mark David Dumlao <madum...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >> > A concensus would be good. A right consensus is more likely to get a >> > consensus. This has no bearing on the matters at hand. >> >> /usr as the default prefix for installed packages is the "consensus" >> of the vast majority of packages out there. Why do you think this has >> no bearing on their consideration? > > I'm just pointing out that despite what many seem to state there are > losses and unclear/non forth coming positive reasons or real benefits > to the current apparently to be imposed or your doomed "consensus" of > consolidating data. Once your at multi-user the whole filesystem is one > for all intensive purposes anyway and so much of what you have said is > misleading. It really shouldn't be a difficult problem to fix, it is > just data after all.
I'm having trouble understanding the whole paragraph - my English parser must have been broken with my last emerge -uDNtav world. I'd revdep-rebuild, but my /usr is on nfs and rebuilding the binaries there would break them for the other shared clients. ;) -- This email is: [ ] actionable [ ] fyi [x] social Response needed: [ ] yes [x] up to you [ ] no Time-sensitive: [ ] immediate [ ] soon [x] none
