Dale <rdalek1...@gmail.com> wrote:

>Alan McKinnon wrote:
>> I'm not sure what to make of this. portage lists the packages
>> correctly and has the SLOTs correct, but emerge seems to be launched
>> incorrectly. It's all very odd, and looks like bug-report material.
>To
>> be useful you are going to need data. Could you quickpkg the current
>> and previous versions of both SLOTs? That will make it easy to
>upgrade
>> and downgrade packages, then run emerge world over and over to see
>> what it does without it taking 40 minutes each time. 
>
>Well, here is this:
>
>[-P-] [  ] sys-apps/portage-2.1.11.63:0
>[-P-] [  ] sys-apps/portage-2.2.0_alpha173:0
>[IP-] [  ] sys-apps/portage-2.2.0_alpha174:0
>
>This is the portage update info.  I use genlop -t to do this.  I know
>there is a better way but can't remember the command.  lol  I think it
>was one of the q thingys. 
>
>     Fri Apr  5 12:49:29 2013 >>> sys-apps/portage-2.2.0_alpha171
>       merge time: 27 seconds.
>
>     Sat Apr  6 11:00:10 2013 >>> sys-apps/portage-2.2.0_alpha171
>       merge time: 26 seconds.
>
>     Mon Apr 15 08:33:49 2013 >>> sys-apps/portage-2.2.0_alpha173
>       merge time: 31 seconds.
>
>     Mon May  6 22:36:15 2013 >>> sys-apps/portage-2.2.0_alpha174
>       merge time: 30 seconds.
>
>
>Based on that, I would say it started about the time *173 hit.  I can't
>go back to the *171 since it is no longer in the tree. 
>
>I'm not sure I know enough about debugging to help much but it sure is
>weird.  Should have known something weird like this would hit me.  :/
>
>I'm sort of pretty active on this thing right now since I do some
>volunteer mod work on a site.  I'd rather not get myself to a spot
>where
>my rig aini't working.  I'm not even doing upgrades like I used to. 
>Well, not as often anyway.  I just have to plan stuff to make sure I'm
>up and running. 
>
>I checked for roach reports and didn't see this reported anywhere.  I
>wonder if a USE flag is triggering this?  This is interesting:
>
>root@fireball / # emerge -pv =sys-devel/gcc-4.4.7 =sys-devel/gcc-4.5.4
>=sys-devel/gcc-4.6.3
>
>These are the packages that would be merged, in order:
>
>Calculating dependencies... done!
>[ebuild   R    ] sys-devel/gcc-4.6.3:4.6  USE="gtk mudflap (multilib)
>nls nptl openmp (-altivec) -cxx* -doc (-fixed-point) -fortran* -gcj
>-graphite (-hardened) (-libssp) -multislot -nopie -nossp -objc -objc++
>-objc-gc {-test} -vanilla" 24 kB
>[ebuild   R    ] sys-devel/gcc-4.4.7:4.4  USE="gtk mudflap (multilib)
>nls nptl openmp (-altivec) -cxx -doc (-fixed-point) -fortran -gcj
>(-hardened) (-libssp) -multislot -nopie -nossp -objc -objc++ -objc-gc
>{-test} -vanilla (-graphite%)" 0 kB
>[ebuild   R    ] sys-devel/gcc-4.5.4:4.5  USE="gtk mudflap (multilib)
>nls nptl openmp (-altivec) -cxx -doc (-fixed-point) -fortran -gcj
>(-hardened) (-libssp) -lto -multislot -nopie -nossp -objc -objc++
>-objc-gc {-test} -vanilla" 0 kB
>
>Total: 3 packages (3 reinstalls), Size of downloads: 24 kB
>
>!!! Multiple package instances within a single package slot have been
>pulled
>!!! into the dependency graph, resulting in a slot conflict:
>
>sys-devel/gcc:4.6
>
> (sys-devel/gcc-4.6.3::gentoo, ebuild scheduled for merge) pulled in by
>    (no parents that aren't satisfied by other packages in this slot)
>
>  (sys-devel/gcc-4.6.3::gentoo, installed) pulled in by
>    sys-devel/gcc[fortran,openmp?] required by
>(virtual/fortran-0::gentoo, installed)
>    >=sys-devel/gcc-4.2[cxx] required by
>(sci-geosciences/googleearth-6.2.2.6613::gentoo, installed)
>
>
>!!! Enabling --newuse and --update might solve this conflict.
>!!! If not, it might help emerge to give a more specific suggestion.
>
>root@fireball / #
>
>I may need to make sense of this now.  May not be the problem but
>still.  I don't have anything related to gcc in package.use either. 
>I'm
>not sure about the USE flag being changed on two but not the other. 
>When I logoff as mod, I'm going to try to recompile that older version.
>
>
>Thoughts?  Could that be the cause?
>
>Dale
>
>:-)  :-) 
>
>-- 
>I am only responsible for what I said ... Not for what you understood
>or how you interpreted my words!

Dale.

My thoughts: enable the 'multislot' useflag for gcc.
Portage is seeing all three as being in the same slot...

--
Joost
-- 
Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.

Reply via email to