Michael Mol <mike...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 05/22/2013 01:36 PM, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> > On 05/22/13 12:36, Samuraiii wrote:
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> I am trying to get hostname address resolution on my LAN and VPN with
> >> one serious problem:
> >> I have two "networks" eg. 10.1.1.0 and 10.2.2.0 which are representing
> >> local address space for LAN (10.1.1.0/8) and VPN address space
> >> (10.2.2.0/8).
> > This isn't two networks, it's one network and you've got the VPN space
> > overlapping the LAN space. To oversimplify a little, Don't Do That.
> >
> > Use a separate subnet for the VPN. Then traffic to the VPN will be
> > routed over the VPN interface as intended, but traffic to the LAN will
> > be routed over the LAN interface. This is what you want, but right now
> > the VPN and the LAN are the same network, so "routing to the LAN" is the
> > same as "routing to the VPN", and your network stack doesn't know what
> > to do with it.
> >
> >
>
> To be clear, replacing /8 with /24 would do this:
>
> 10.1.1.0/8, as a "network", is really just 10.0.0.0/8. This is also true
> of 10.2.2.0/8. The bits after the first 8 are irrelevant, since a /8 is
> being used. Use /24 instead, in this case.
>
> It would be good for Samuraiii to read up:
>
> http://www.tcpipguide.com/free/t_IPAddressing.htm
OK, I see now, never mind my previous post.
--
Your life is like a penny. You're going to lose it. The question is:
How do
you spend it?
John Covici
cov...@ccs.covici.com
