-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 09/29/2013 02:52 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
> All,
> 
> I can clarify one part of the systemd issue, because I have been 
> involved in this part of the issue for months. Again,  I am not
> trying to start a dispute here, just providing a clarification.
> 
> The choice to install all of the systemd binaries in /usr is not
> an upstream choice. It was a choice made a year ago when our
> systemd team was one person [1], and now the team doesn't want to
> change it because it would require users to go through a migration,
> and the rest of the team doesn't see a benefit in changing it since
> it still links to libraries in /usr/lib.
> 
> I joined the team, primarily to take responsibility for this change
> and to try to make it go as smoothly as possible, but I was
> overruled even though upstream gave us a pretty strong warning
> about it.
> 
> William
> 
> [1] 
> http://blogs.gentoo.org/mgorny/2012/01/04/moving-systemd-into-usr-the-technical-side/
>
> 
Ouch. So systemd upstream doesn't suggest putting binaries in /usr?
That shows at least a little respect for /bin, et al. Based on the
blog post, I'm getting the feeling that -- for systemd anyway -- the
issues with /usr are caused by its dependencies rather than systemd
itself. If dbus and whatnot were in /bin where they belong, the need
for an initramfs (for separate /usr) and/or dealing with things in a
non-standard place wouldn't need to happen.

I'm not affected by anything regarding the /usr switch, but I'd like
to have a good talk with the first person who decided a
system-critical binary belonged in /usr instead of /bin or /sbin.
They've created a mess for every distro and any project that depends
on their work.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.20 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJSSMu5AAoJEJUrb08JgYgHFz4H/iyZt6MlTeW702KOlIy2Ydse
mzsfiyPfPz8Rbz0Mqp5/17R8aQzOUG4l6dZS7d9HFKuMCG7t+kNZCSvxD69XeTVO
tZY6YjHCGQaE6WaAMbiasXfRTeRt4ZDtP5l/lCUsYcTCWN13PyIcHCb5rGNHnHqq
J/OcSeF5EoS+G/uSAuzDVaQ5wa0Z0qkqVSqQGjJ5NUHYIA5ZrtYpMNDR+MkFYYAB
7I4JE5kDXRYoBSiLLDb7tI7F1nGogHXxzECmMYW4ZneU0AJwhUAK0kU+oTHY2Z9Q
8TcjpdaG1BH4gA2NT+i+ZJz4XNqkMPa2vbvhcfGFs9Dg7IwabiuunOzh0GQM1S4=
=jgci
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Reply via email to