On Mon, 17 Feb 2014 14:52:33 -0500 Tanstaafl wrote: > On 2014-02-17 12:52 PM, Andrew Savchenko <birc...@gmail.com> wrote: > > And this is a very, very bad idea. Looks like you don't know matter at > > all: to begin with kdbus protocol is NOT compatible dbus and special > > converter daemon will be needed to enable dbus to talk to kdbus. The > > whole kdbus technology is very questionable itself (and was > > forcefully pushed by RH devs), anyway it is possible to disable this > > stuff in kernel and guess what will be done on my systems. > > Forcefully? Are you saying that *anyone* can *force* Linus to put > something into the kernel?
OK, my choice of words was not appropriate. I mean that not every kernel dev is happy that kdbus is in the kernel now. > I'd also really, *really* like to hear a *recent* opinion from Linus on > systemd... Judging from his previous opinions this one is unlikely to be systemd- friendly. Best regards, Andrew Savchenko
pgpoH_OQWnQcJ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
