-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 04/29/2014 03:58 PM, Walter Dnes wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 01:32:46PM -0400, Rick "Zero_Chaos" Farina wrote
> 
>> On 04/29/2014 12:27 PM, Walter Dnes wrote:
>>>
>>>   Another couple of things I didn't realize.  According to
>>> https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Dm-crypt I have to build in support for the
>>> crypt target in the kernel.  It also suggests
>>> <*> SHA224 and SHA256 digest algorithm
>>>
>>>   Any comments on their strength?  I'm not worried about the NSA or CSIS
>>> as much as opportunistic criminals.
>>
>> I use whirlpool.  Why you ask? It sounds cool! Also it supported 512bit
>> which seems nice.
> 
>   Sorry to pester you, but I'm beginning to realize just how much is
> involved here that I'm a newbie at.  Two more questions...
> 
> 1) If multiple encryption algorithms are enabled in the kernel, how does
> the system decide which one to use?

dmcrypt/luks stores the proper encryption algorithm, as long as the
correct one is supported you are all set.
> 
> 2) I assume that if I want to use the same encrypted USB key on 2 or
> more machines, then the kernels of all the machines must be built with
> the same encryption algorithms?
> 
No, but they do both need the encryption and hashing algorithm you are
using.

- -Zero
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
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=53C+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Reply via email to