>> Is there a >> filesystem that will make that unnecessary and exhibit better >> reliability than NTFS? > > Yes, FAT. It works and works well. > Or exFAT which is Microsoft's solution to the problem of very large > files on FAT.
FAT32 won't work for me since I need to use files larger than 4GB. I know it's beta software but should exfat be more reliable than ntfs? > Which NTFS system are you using? > > ntfs kernel module? It's quite dodgy and unsafe with writes > ntfs-ng on fuse? I find that one quite solid I'm using ntfs-ng as opposed to the kernel option(s). - Grant
