On Sunday 25 June 2006 10:21, Mick wrote: > I suspect that it has something to do with the latest portage-2.1-r1 > update or the one before. Up until now the -java default USE flag > seemed to do the trick.
It had nothing to do with portage. It had to do with a change in the java-pkg eclass. > Is ity worth me adding to a bug report? Would you perhaps have a bug No > handy? I didn't think so. I was wrong... ;) The dependency was removed two days ago in case you haven't noticed [1]. [1] http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=137971 -- Bo Andresen
pgpAlqpSsI3f1.pgp
Description: PGP signature
