On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 9:05 AM, David Leverton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> On Tuesday 16 September 2008 22:14:47 b.n. wrote:
> > Frankly, the more you challenge him this mindless way, the more I
> > believe him.
>
> If you think in such backwards logic then I don't care who you believe.
>
>
A apologize in advance if this assessment may be under/over stating
something, I've not really taken part of this discussion, and don't really
care of what the outcome is, I'll keep using my ${choice}, if ${choice} goes
away ill go back and fork ${choice} to bring it back. But you do appear to
be going out of your way to cause unwanted flame wars. ( I'm being the
ultra fool by joining in the fray here ).
It would be nice if this bonfire could settle, and I'll request so by
mocking myself and all amateur geekdom at once with
"liek, omg gaiz. chi11!!!!"
Cheers.
Can we all kiss and make up now?
--
Kent
ruby -e '[1, 2, 4, 7, 0, 9, 5, 8, 3, 10, 11, 6, 12, 13].each{|x|
print "enNOSPicAMreil [EMAIL PROTECTED]"[(2*x)..(2*x+1)]}'
