On Mittwoch 11 Februar 2009, james wrote: > Volker Armin Hemmann <volkerarmin <at> googlemail.com> writes: > > > 6. emerge -DNv kde-meta > > > > > > Look plausible? Verbose comments are most welcome. > > > > just emerge the kde-4.2 set instead of that meta stuff. > > Is there a problem with kde-meta-4.2.0 ? I have many different > users asking for many different things, under kde. > Kde-meta make my life simpler. However, if you have > a technical reason not to install kde-meta, for example > too many failed components, then please explain > in some detail.... Just to save disk space or compile > time, is not a relevant reason for me. I'm interested > in why you say no to kde-meta? > > > James
because meta packages are on their way to be phased out and sets are the way to go? Sets are working great? Easier to unmask/keyword?
