2009/2/25 Neil Bothwick <n...@digimed.co.uk> > On Wed, 25 Feb 2009 21:11:38 +0100, Momesso Andrea wrote: > > > > No, but they are stable, and required for sets as the OP wanted. > > > Doesn't look really stable: > > > > # Zac Medico <zmed...@gentoo.org> (05 Jan 2009) > > # Portage 2.2 is masked due to known bugs in the > > # package sets and preserve-libs features. > > >=sys-apps/portage-2.2_pre > > That depends on the severity of the known bugs, and the likelihood of > meeting them. The only real bug I've had is that I had to emerge > @preserved-rebuild several times, after one update, before it would go > away. A waste of CPU cycles but hardly a stability threat. > > > -- > Neil Bothwick > > Top Oxymorons Number 12: Plastic glasses >
I just upgraded to the latatest portage version rc23 or similar. Added the set file linked in the KDE 4.x guide in /etc/portage/sets/kde. also unmasked all the packes also linked in the same guide I see a set called kde, but still i can't install kde because i get blocks and non-existant sets... so better i will wait to instll kde and also use the new version of portage.
