Hello again Martin
OK, so I compiled GeoTools from the source (I was just happily using
Maven jars until now) and modified those lines in DirectEpsgFactory and
AbstractEpsgFactory. Everything works now, and I can reproject data and
coverages and all to EPSG:4291!
As a note to whoever is reading this and has the same problem: while
debugging I ended up seeing that I had to change the return value for
the 9108 code, although my original EPSG code was 4291. Not sure why,
though..
It ends up like this:
case 9108: return Units.DEGREE_MINUTE_SECOND;
becomes
case 9108: return NonSI.DEGREE_ANGLE;
Anyway, Martin, if you have any other info on how to use that hint (or
anything else) to reach a more elegant and "non-intrusive" solution, it
would be great!
Thanks again for the support. Really appreciate it!
Milton
Martin Desruisseaux wrote:
> Milton Jonathan a écrit :
>> I was wondering now: when using DMS units, what would be the idea for
>> representing 10°30'30'' in real databases? 10.3030? Does anybody
>> actually store data this way??
>
> It depends if they are "DM" or "DMS" units. Both exists.
>
> I'm not aware of anyone storing data that way in the EPSG database. But
> EPSG mandate us to express them that way for some CRS (not all of them -
> mostly the legacy CRS. Recently-defined CRS all use decimal degrees as
> far as I know). I would bet that most implementations ignore this EPSG
> requirements, but this is just a guess.
>
> Martin
>
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
_______________________________________________
Geotools-gt2-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-gt2-users
