On Fri, Mar 19, 2004 at 10:50:23AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Fri, Mar 19, 2004 at 08:56:36AM +0100, Henrik Brix Andersen wrote: > [stuff deleted] > > > > The only thing that struck me as missing was the work involved with > > porting the plug-ins to the new API, but Rapha?l already pointed that > > out in another reply to this thread. > > I very much hope that at least this time around, since so much is anyhow > changed, the PDB will finally get the face lift and use named parameters > instead of positional ones.
A PDB revamp is planned. While on that subject, I'm wondering what a good way of representing named parameters in scheme and perl would be. Any thoughts? -Yosh _______________________________________________ Gimp-developer mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
