Manish Singh ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 20, 2004 at 12:58:25AM +0100, Simon Budig wrote:
> > For scheme we could do something like this:
> >
> > (script-fu-foo-bar '("image" image)
> > '("drawable" drawable)
> > '("radius" 5.5)
> > '("size" 300))
> >
> > or (less clutter)
> >
> > (script-fu-foo-bar "image" image
> > "drawable" drawable
> > "radius" 5.5
> > "size" 300)
> >
> > that having said: I don't have much experience with scheme outside
> > script fu, so there might be a convention out there on how to do named
> > parameters.
>
> Again there is the problem of differeniating between positional
> and named usage.
Ok, thinking some more about it: What about using symbols as parameter
identifiers?
(script-fu-foo-bar 'image image
'drawable drawable
'radius 5.5
'size 300)
passing symbols to the PDB doesn't make sense, so this could be used
to differentiate.
Bye,
Simon
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.home.unix-ag.org/simon/
_______________________________________________
Gimp-developer mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
