Daniel Egger wrote: > Am Die, 2003-07-22 um 21.57 schrieb David Neary: > > Actually, I'm not sure I see the benefits in not having html as > > the primary format... Sure, we could go for a format which allows > > multi-node searching (like info only better), but html docs would > > have the added benefit of not needing to be local and still being > > usable. > > What do you mean by "not needing to be local"? The problem is exactly > that the filenames have to be known in advance so we can link to them; > this means that for HTML the files have to be in a known place (defined > at compile time) and there has to be a mapping.
I may be missing the point, but if you use relative paths for
linking, there wouldn't be a problem, would there?
In any case, I bow to your greater knowledge :) I really know
very little about documentation mark-up.
> - a webbrowser is by design not the optimal tool to view online help
> while working with the application
> - a webbrowser cannot provide fulltext search over all documentation
> since it doesn't see the whole text at once
I understood that docbook2html xslt was out there, and that there
were utilities that did docbook to pdf, html or text fairly
easily.
> until the projected date of release of GIMP 2.0 and as such it doesn't
> make a whole lot of sense to me to bend over trying to somehow get the
> transformation and the help-browser in place because it's a waste of
> precious time when not knowing that it'll be used for a longer period of
> time. The explanation I proviced about displaying HTML instead of
> DocBook directly (still just for the online help!) should show why this
> an inferior solution. I've a few more points in case someone wants to
> discuss it over, but for me there's no point in supporting a quick hack
> instead of a proper long term solution which the HTML one simply cannot
> be, at least not in this form, and I haven't heard of a better one yet.
It's clear that I don't understand the problems involved, so as I
said before, as far as deployment goes, I bow to your better
judgement.
Cheers,
Dave.
--
David Neary,
Lyon, France
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
