Hello Yitzchak, Thursday, January 17, 2008, 7:10:54 PM, you wrote:
> Wow, I didn't realize that. Now I understand Bulat. In a > project of any serious size and complexity, the use > of static or dynamic linking is often architechted in and > cannot be changed. So LGPL is really bad for a general > purpose compiler like GHC. We've got to make GMP > optional, or get rid of it. things are even worse because we just don't have an option of dynamic GMP linkage (and i'm not sure whether it is possible taking into account that many GMP functions should be just inlined in GHC RTS and generated code to make things faster) -- Best regards, Bulat mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
