OK, my apologies for hijacking this thread, I haven't been on a mailing list in forever but I will apply proper etiquette. Can I just ask what you mean by "top post" though?
On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 9:25 PM Greg Rundlett (freephile) < g...@freephile.com> wrote: > Hi Anthony! Welcome! > > You can just reply to the list in general, but it doesn't hurt to reply-all > > You should always start a new topic with a new thread ;-). And never top > post (unless you're me and using a phone) > > ~ Greg > > On Jun 27, 2017 8:00 PM, "R. Anthony Lomartire" <opensourcek...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Also sorry idk if there is an intro thread or anything, but I've been a >> lurker for a while this has been my first actual post I think. I don't know >> if I should reply all or just send my reply to the GNHLUG email address? >> >> Anyways just quickly, I'm Tony and I'm in ad tech. We use machine >> learning to help advertisers optimize their ROI. At first I thought it >> would be lame, but at least it was a job, but gradually I have become more >> and more interested in ad tech and it is actually kinda cool. Ok so hiii! >> >> On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 7:55 PM R. Anthony Lomartire < >> opensourcek...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> No offense or anything but I find it amusing that one of the most active >>> threads on this mailer has been about copying a bit of data :D >>> >>> On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 6:29 PM Matt Minuti <matt.min...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> My muscle memory always puts the flags "-avz" (sometimes I even >>>> remember to add a P in there), so there must have been one point in time >>>> where you had to specify compression. Might still be the case. >>>> >>>> On Tue, Jun 27, 2017, 12:02 PM mark <prg...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> My mistake. I wrote encryption when I meant compression, as I belive >>>>> rsync always compresses--but I could be mistaken about that, too! >>>>> >>>>> Mark >>>>> On Jun 27, 2017 11:55 AM, "Tom Buskey" <t...@buskey.name> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> rsync doesn't encrypt if there's no remote, as in this case. >>>>>> >>>>>> To be pedantic, rsync to remotes uses ssh by default but it can use >>>>>> rsh which has no encryption. Some older versions of SSH allowed you to >>>>>> specify the encryption. I recall using XOR encryption for faster >>>>>> operation >>>>>> where security was not needed. >>>>>> >>>>>> Encryption typically does some compression. If you compress 2x, >>>>>> you're doubling the bits through the pipe in the same time. If the >>>>>> encryption/compression computation at either end is faster than than the >>>>>> uncompressed bandwidth, you'll have faster throughput. That's very >>>>>> typical >>>>>> on newer multicore, high GHz CPUs. >>>>>> >>>>>> On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 4:11 PM, mark <prg...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Locally, cp is faster because you cannot make rsync not encrypt, but >>>>>>> the restart-from-where-it-stopped feature of rsync makes it worth the >>>>>>> wait. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Mark >>>>>>> On Jun 26, 2017 3:18 PM, "Charles Farinella" < >>>>>>> cfarine...@appropriatesolutions.com> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> We need to copy a large (200+GB) directory from one filesystem to >>>>>>>> another, both locally mounted. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I'm unsure as to what I should use to do this, cp, rsync, dd? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Any suggestions appreciated. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Thanks. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> --charlie >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Charlie Farinella >>>>>>>> Systems Administrator >>>>>>>> Appropriate Solutions, Inc. >>>>>>>> 1-603-924-6079 <(603)%20924-6079> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>> gnhlug-discuss mailing list >>>>>>>> gnhlug-discuss@mail.gnhlug.org >>>>>>>> http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-discuss/ >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>> gnhlug-discuss mailing list >>>>>>> gnhlug-discuss@mail.gnhlug.org >>>>>>> http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-discuss/ >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> gnhlug-discuss mailing list >>>>> gnhlug-discuss@mail.gnhlug.org >>>>> http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-discuss/ >>>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> gnhlug-discuss mailing list >>>> gnhlug-discuss@mail.gnhlug.org >>>> http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-discuss/ >>>> >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> gnhlug-discuss mailing list >> gnhlug-discuss@mail.gnhlug.org >> http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-discuss/ >> >>
_______________________________________________ gnhlug-discuss mailing list gnhlug-discuss@mail.gnhlug.org http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-discuss/
