Ben Scott <dragonh...@gmail.com> writes: > > On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 8:31 PM, Bill McGonigle <b...@bfccomputing.com> wrote: > > Doing it well enough for anybody to want to watch is tricky. > > Doing it well is hard, agreed. But in this age of shaky, grainy, > noisy YouTube videos, doing it "good enough" is becoming more viable. > I've done some proof-of-concept tests and gotten surprisingly good > results relative to the setup (e.g., $200 point-and-shoot camera > mounted on a table tripod).
*YouTube*? Heck--after growing up on *movies* like `The Blair Witch Project' and *TV shows* like `Battlestar Galactica', all with liberally-applied `MTV-style' camerawork, I find anything that's *not* shaky and generally lacking in cinematic refinement to be *completely unwatchable*! And don't get me started on audio! ;) -- "Don't be afraid to ask (λf.((λx.xx) (λr.f(rr))))." _______________________________________________ gnhlug-org mailing list gnhlug-org@mail.gnhlug.org http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-org/
