On Wed, 20 Feb 2002, Tom Buskey wrote: > I'm able to read it just fine. However, I'm using exmh too.
It is the integrated GPG/PGP armor decoding, not exmh per se, that enables you to read what Paul said. > So some of us can read Paul's stuff. Yah, and the Outlook users can read the Outlook barf, too. Some of us just want plain old text. 7-bit ASCII. No special language characters. No ANSI control codes. No HTML. No special encodings. No multi-color custom-font inline-image emails that talk when you open them. Plain old fscking text, that works on everything from a Timex Sinclair to a toaster. (Sorry for the rant, but I've been (trying) to communication with someone who only sends email as HTML marked as "text/plain" today, and it has made me wish for the good ole days when men were men and sent email by "telnet localhost 25". ;-) -- Ben Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | The opinions expressed in this message are those of the author and do not | | necessarily represent the views or policy of any other person, entity or | | organization. All information is provided without warranty of any kind. | ***************************************************************** To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the text 'unsubscribe gnhlug' in the message body. *****************************************************************
