Richard Stallman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Since RealPlayer is non-free software, not respecting users' freedom, > we don't want to legitimize its use. > > RealPlayer is very well known, probably having more users than Emacs. > So it is ok to have a package for using Emacs with RealPlayer; I think > its main effect will be to encourage use of Emacs, not encourage > installation of RealPlayer.
PalmOS is als well known and also has a lot more users than Emacs. But there you say it is unethical to use it and support should be dropped. Personally I don't really see the difference between PalmOS and RealPlayer. Both are non-free, proprietary, closed and unethical. Maybe you have some secret agenda but these ad-hoc opinions and suggestions to package writers are rather weird to read. They are amusing though :-) S. _______________________________________________ gnu-emacs-sources mailing list gnu-emacs-sources@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-emacs-sources
