The difference between Richard's and your perspective is that your
approach is possibly focusing more on the usability issues and
allowing users to benefit from a free platform while still being
able to access proprietary content as easily as users of closed
proprietary systems. I think Richard's perspective would be that
this has the danger of giving up some of our freedoms without
really realising what we may be sacrificing in the long term for a
short term gain (i.e. access to the proprietary content). Richar's
perspective is likely that if you believe your freedom is
important enough, you will sacrifice short term access to the
content in favor of protecting your long-term freedom.
You have it exactly right.
_______________________________________________
gnu-emacs-sources mailing list
gnu-emacs-sources@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-emacs-sources
