[ ... ] > Meaning that even if the Google Translation software is released under > the GNU Affero license, this software wouldn't be as useful for 3rd part > as it is for Google, unless they also disclose their database - which is > highly unprobable. > >> Probably nothing. Why? >> Because you lack the databases. > > Right. >
Fine. BTW: Think that's not just a new category of problems, but a major one - without people seem aware of it to the extent in deserves IMO. Depending on databases only accessible through a privately owned Net-API is one thing. The knowledge gathered and created behind and upon these databases another issue. Depending via some Net-API at the results - but being deprived of all knowledge to get these results alternatively seems not recommendable with respect to human nature. Cheers Andreas _______________________________________________ gnu-emacs-sources mailing list gnu-emacs-sources@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-emacs-sources
