Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote: > > Ter, 2006-07-04 Ã s 19:17 +0200, Alexander Terekhov escreveu: > > Q: Bzzzzt, but according to RMS, "intellectual property... is a mirage, > > which appears to have a coherent existence only because the term > > suggests it does." So bzzzzt, what the fuck ... !? > > > > A: Well, well, well. But according to one FTC commissioner (and an > > antitrust attorney), > > Alex, please let me understand your reasoning: > > Because a text is published by some law authority like FTC "is", or > Attoneries are, or even Judges... does that have to be taken as Official > in the Point of View of Law?
Consider: http://www.denbar.org/group/index.cfm?category=1105&EntityID=DBA "... COURTESY AND CIVILITY 1. We will work together toward resolution of our cases by being reasonable. ... 6. We will scrupulously refrain from making misleading statements of law or fact, whether by omission, inference or implication." Moglens "license-not-a-contract" and http://emoglen.law.columbia.edu/research-agenda.html not only violates the standards, it warrants disbarment. I'm for free speech and all that, but please... "Professor Of History and *GNU* Law" or something. regards, alexander. _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
