--- cornel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Mario > It would be helpful to figure out what you mean by > "true knowledge." That concept was largely rejected > when religious knowledge was questioned with > the rise of modernity. Further, one would even be > pressed very hard to refer to anything in science > as "true knowledge." > > Have you missed the boat along the way on this kind > of discussion? > Mario replies: > No, but I think it is you who has missed the boat and has fallen into the water:-)) > Let's see if I can give you an example of true knowledge that even you, who is so highly schooled that everything is relative, will be able to understand. > How about the true scientific knowledge that a properly designed object if moving above a certain speed, can be made to rise up off the ground and stay up as long as it has enough fuel to maintain it's speed? > Or, how about the true scientific knowledge that if one jumps off a tall building, one will fall to the ground and die? Those who would "... be pressed very hard to refer to anything in science as "true knowledge." should try it sometime :-)) >
_____________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. Goanet mailing list (Goanet@goanet.org)