The adapter class adds overhead though and you need to convert into and out of it every time you pass it to JS. At that point you may as well use Java.util.List and write an adapter around JS array.
On Mon, May 8, 2017 at 7:10 AM Jens <jens.nehlme...@gmail.com> wrote: > IMHO if you want a JavaScript array, set, map behave the same as a Java > collection, so you can use it with other libraries, you should write an > adapter class that implements the Java API and operates internally on the > JavaScript data type. > > Basically do not rely on invisible magic. That could easily be implemented > as a 3rd party project. > > -- J. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "GWT Contributors" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to google-web-toolkit-contributors+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/4d08f88c-ec88-4818-b778-3e0e247f2e7e%40googlegroups.com > <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/4d08f88c-ec88-4818-b778-3e0e247f2e7e%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> > . > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT Contributors" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-web-toolkit-contributors+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/CAPVRV7eX8PrDNzesa%2Ba-LrB6Y5FEW61Zu1O9Rzatapm72CWgOQ%40mail.gmail.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
