I've now had some time to spruce up the search feature. Amazing what progress Lucene has made in the last few years. Search is slightly faster now, there is less code on our end, and I found and fixed a couple of rare bugs involving HTML escaping.
What I can't do is reproduce your problem; it works fine for me. We seem to be calculating the link differently. Is something unclear in the documentation? http://www.mail-archive.com/faq.html#listserver -Jeff >>> import hashlib >>> import base64 >>> message_id = "51f69250.5090...@libreoffice.org" >>> list_post = "disc...@de.libreoffice.org" >>> sha = hashlib.sha1(message_id) >>> sha.update(list_post) >>> hash = base64.urlsafe_b64encode(sha.digest()) >>> url = "http://go.mail-archive.com/%s"; % hash >>> print url http://go.mail-archive.com/GNXPfUlFDrZhnUZ4SH7cDfXZSKQ= On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 3:47 AM, Christian Lohmaier <lohma...@googlemail.com> wrote: > Hi Jeff, *, > > we stumbled across another non-working archive-link - the targeted > message is in the archive, and newer and older messages are accessible > using the hash-URLs. > > The message in question is: > http://www.mail-archive.com/discuss@de.libreoffice.org/msg15830.html > and the corresponding, non-working archived-at link is > http://go.mail-archive.com/c-LzIp2g0mD_PUzGjm4_-yBorXU= > > Contrary to the problems with the links in the past, searching by the > message-ID alone returns the result <51f69250.5090...@libreoffice.org> > > Hope you can dig up what is wrong. > > ciao > Christian > > > -- > To unsubscribe, send mail to gossip-unsubscr...@jab.org. -- To unsubscribe, send mail to gossip-unsubscr...@jab.org.
