That test shows that these are definitely two different files, not
links to the same file.
My hunch is that there is something in the device handling code that
inserts "OpenVistA", perhaps a workaround for something else, I don't
know. You really need to look at the code to see how path names are
constructed on your system.
This is certainly a strange one.
===
Gregory Woodhouse
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"It is a capital mistake to theorize before one has data."
--Sir Arthur Conan Doyle
On Jun 20, 2005, at 9:46 PM, Usha wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] VistA]# ls -id /home/vista/VistA/patmast.txt
6291844 /home/vista/VistA/patmast.txt
[EMAIL PROTECTED] VistA]# ls -id /home/vista/OpenVistA/patmast.txt
4112950 /home/vista/OpenVistA/patmast.txt
[EMAIL PROTECTED] VistA]#
Usha
-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies
from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles,
informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to
speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7477&alloc_id=16492&op=click
_______________________________________________
Hardhats-members mailing list
Hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/hardhats-members
