On 5/24/06, Ivan Volosyuk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Agree. We have the GC interfaces declared in:
hmm... who is the "we"? Perhaps you are referring to Harmony DRLVM donation. Incidentally, my original question about MMTK interface
vm/include/open/gc.h vm/include/open/vm_gc.h The interfaces hide implementation of VM, providing functionality to get root set in stop-the-world state, callbacks for object allocation and write barriers. Please, take a look at it. If you have questions, suggestions, extension feel free to ask.
OK. Will do. Thanks again. Incidentally, how do I ask Apache legal to tell us if MMTK license is compatible with Apache? I'd hate to start a port of MMTK to Harmony JVM only to find out that the end-product can not be checked-in to Apache svn.
-- Ivan 2006/5/25, Daniel Feinberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > So i have something to chime in with. Since this could be simple from > the beginning and grow more complex as we develop it, we could start > with an interface to the VM. This part is fairly isolated in the code. > I think that as a starting point would be good. > > What does everybody else think? > > Daniel --------------------------------------------------------------------- Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- Weldon Washburn Intel Middleware Products Division --------------------------------------------------------------------- Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
