I agree. This situation is totally detectable.
On 9/23/07, Neil Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi > > > I'm not sure, but since it would require the detection of an evaluation > > that does not terminate, it comes down to the halting problem, which is > > not generally solvable. Maybe the experts can confirm my intuition? > > I think your intuition is off. This isn't the problem of detecting > that a computation might not halt, its a question of detecting after > the fact a very restricted case of non-termination has occurred. I > think it should be possible to assign threads etc to these things, but > may make the code run slower in the common case. > > Thanks > > Neil > _______________________________________________ > Haskell-Cafe mailing list > Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org > http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe >
_______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
