On Thu, 2009-09-24 at 19:48 +0100, Andy Gimblett wrote:

> That's great news for me, except: that's what I tried first, and I've  
> just tried it again and it still doesn't seem to work for me.  Perhaps  
> I am doing something wrong...?

You're quite right, it got broken with the move to haddock2. The code in
Cabal-1.6 skips the pre-processing when using haddock2, assuming haddock
will handle it. In the current Cabal development version it works
properly and I get the right output for your example.

Duncan

_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe

Reply via email to