On Thu, 2009-09-24 at 19:48 +0100, Andy Gimblett wrote: > That's great news for me, except: that's what I tried first, and I've > just tried it again and it still doesn't seem to work for me. Perhaps > I am doing something wrong...?
You're quite right, it got broken with the move to haddock2. The code in Cabal-1.6 skips the pre-processing when using haddock2, assuming haddock will handle it. In the current Cabal development version it works properly and I get the right output for your example. Duncan _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe