On 24 Sep 2009, at 20:10, Duncan Coutts wrote:
On Thu, 2009-09-24 at 19:48 +0100, Andy Gimblett wrote:
That's great news for me, except: that's what I tried first, and I've
just tried it again and it still doesn't seem to work for me.
Perhaps
I am doing something wrong...?
You're quite right, it got broken with the move to haddock2. The
code in
Cabal-1.6 skips the pre-processing when using haddock2, assuming
haddock
will handle it. In the current Cabal development version it works
properly and I get the right output for your example.
Ah, righto. In that case, I won't shy away from LHS, and I'll be
patient for the next Cabal release, or maybe even check out the
development version. :-)
Many thanks for your reassurance!
Cheers,
-Andy
_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
