On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 8:15 PM, Yucheng Zhang <yczhan...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I expected the type of 'x' to be universally quantified, and thus can be 
> unified
> with 'forall a. a' with no problem.

I've never been thinking in a detailed level, and the 'x' appears to be able to
take any type, and thus the wrong expectation.

Thanks for all the input from all.

_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe

Reply via email to