Re: Felleisen on Standard Haskell

[Daan Leijen]

Simon writes:

>That's just what I intend to do.  I don't see Std Haskell as a big
>deal, but even little deals are worth completing rather than
>leaving as loose ends... and I'm more optimistic than Paul about
>the usefulness of Std Haskell.  I would be happy to find a name
>that was less grand and final-sounding than 'Standard Haskell' though;
>but more final sounding than 'Haskell 1.5'.


What about "Haskell 98" ?
Sounds more final as 1.5 but less final as a Standard :-)

-- Daan