Sorry for my delayed response to your questions. I asked our SMF guru for a description of the 2 SMF records in question, here is what I got: 136 IGGPOST0 DADSM Alloc. 139 IGGPOST0 DADSM Scratch
I am still looking for the reason. I think, as most have suggested, that DFHSM is the culprit. However since I do not have the SMF tapes going back to October 24 2010 backwrds it is hard to prove the cause of the deletion. --- On Wed, 7/13/11, Elardus Engelbrecht <elardus.engelbre...@sita.co.za> wrote: From: Elardus Engelbrecht <elardus.engelbre...@sita.co.za> Subject: Re: DFHSM QUESTION - PRIMARY SPACE MANAGEMENT To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Received: Wednesday, July 13, 2011, 11:47 AM Elardus Engelbrecht wrote: >willie bunter wrote: >>I went back as far as July 01 SMF records and nothing showed despite >>searching for records 14 15 17 18 61 62 63 64 65 67 68 136 & 139 >Why SMF record type 138 and 139? What product is generating them? Aw, f** s***, I really mean SMF type 136, not 138! Damn that stupid fingers of me! ;-D Groete / Greetings Elardus Engelbrecht ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
