On Tue, 13 Sep 2011 12:26:45 -0400, Tony Harminc wrote: > >> The intention was to create the object module then use CMS ZAPTEXT >> to update it then use the result in a SMPE PTF ++MOD statement. > >Could you not ZAP load modules using AMASPZAP, and then use ++PROGRAM >in SMP/E? I realize that this may introduce other maintenance >problems, but then I have no idea why you need to zap and package in >the first place. > Unavailable source code?
Or, the PTF could be formed as a ++ZAP. I don't like that very much. conflicts with REDO. >> From what I am hearing the delinkers are old and may not produce an accurate >> object. > >I wouldn't say that. I'm not aware of a case where a delinker will >silently produce an object deck that doesn't match the load module. >But there are certainly load modules that cannot be handled >completely. To say nothing of Program Objects, of course... > But I reported a bug once (it choked on something like an empty CSECT.) The CBT instance was repaired promptly. -- gil ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
