On Fri, 24 Oct 2008 16:42:16 +0000, Ted MacNEIL <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>At last, some common sense! Even in SAS-L there are complaints about costs. > >At the last site I worked at, I managed to justify SAS only because SAS Institute intsituted sub-capacity licensing (finally). > >So, we ran it on a 128 MIPS 890 LPAR, for 35% of the previous licence for the same box. So you created, basically, a SAS-only LPAR? Yuck! Possible, but not what I'd call desirable. Taken to a logical extreme, that would mean that I would create "n" LPARs of various MSU levels and then run each product in the LPAR which most closely matched its needs. -- John ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html