On Wed, May 15, 2002 at 10:52:39AM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > On Wed, 15 May 2002, Scott Russell wrote: > > On Wed, May 15, 2002 at 10:35:04AM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > > > I don't know about all the other patches, though. I have included the > > > safe_flock patches, and I *may* include the alarm and locking stuff in > > > master-avail.diff later, but I must study and understand it first. > > > > Are the patches TLS sane / tested? At one point I remember reading > > The ones I am including in Debian are. No TLS is _not_ an option IMHO. >
Agreed. I'm thankful to the people who took the time to track this down and write the patch. I'm also thankful to those who added TLS support to the patch :) -- Regards, Scott Russell ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Linux Technology Center, System Admin, RHCE. T/L 441-9289 / External 919-543-9289 http://bzimage.raleigh.ibm.com/webcam
